His325: African American History

Upon the start of the Civil War , the topmost resultant constituent was non exactly the abolishment or the saving of the universe of thralldom because of concerns all over honourableity . The primary concern of the politicians of the time were forefinger , curiously economic dominanceSlavery , of course , was an essential ingredient in the propagation of the Civil War . The contend would not deport occurred had the institution of thraldom not existed , nor if the blue states had remitd thrall hardly although thraldom was the big issue , the majority of the population of the grey states that condoned thrall actually were not slave owners . provided the scrimping of the gray states dep annuled more than often than not on the the cotton plant enterprise , and olibanum on the slaves that worked the cotton f ields . It was the slave owners - the rich , including the politicians - that had not bad(p) quest in the issue . The slave owners were aware that the abolition of bondage would as well mean the collapse of the economy of the SouthThe bit was different in the jointureern states : there were the abolitionists , who wanted to end the institution of thralldom there were those who supported slaveholding , and those who were neutral , or who plainly wanted to keep thralldom from expanding . Although it was also an issue of pietism during that time , the abolition or preservation of the institution of slavery was primarily an economic concern . The preservation and splay of slavery was in the interest of the economy of the Southern states , while the Northern States wanted to keep the spread of slavery in represent , by which they could maintain economic and governmental power over the South (and , secondarily , support their anti-slavery moral stanceFor a yen time , until the mid-1800 s , only a atomic minority ha! d an active voice interest in the issue of slavery , mostly politicians and abolitionists . But a growing insecurity over economic and political power brought the issue to national direction . In 1820 , the second agree was enacted .

It was a legislative attain that was in the interest of the North , effectively suppressing the spread of slavery by throttle the practice and introduction of slavery to subscribe to territories However , in 1854 , the Kansas-Nebraska Act rendered null the Missouri Compromise , effectively allowing the spread of slavery into new territories . The Kansas-Nebraska act espoused the construct of Popular sovereignty , where a territory s citizens would decide for themselves whether or not to condone slaveryThe Kansas-Nebraska act brought national awareness to the issue of slavery . Fearing its cast out consequences , the North acted decisively Although some middle-ground politicians such(prenominal) as Abraham Lincoln were against slavery , they were against the idea of civil war . However several politicians on both sides became active in their cause Political leading of the South strove to defend their pay to own slaves , while those of the North , the abolitionists in particular desire to end slavery . Those politicians of the who had the more extreme views concerning the economy (and the morality of slavery ) eventually accomplished the civil war , and for plea they...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper