Population Growth Causes Poverty :: Expository Cause Effect Essays

Everywhere in the world, in every kind of culture, the poorest race brace the most children. Does having many children make quite a little poor? Or does being poor make people have many children?That is a hot question in the continuous struggle over how to devolve foreign aid money. Those who think population developing causes poverty aid programs in family planning and population education. Those who think poverty causes population growth favor direct economic aid, jobs, capital investment. Take care of development, they say, and the wear calculate will take care of itself.Advocates of both sides have capture to the village of Manupur in the province of Punjab in north India to prove themselves right. in that location is nothing special about Manupur. It is a typical Indian village, with a population in 1950 of about 1200, mostly farmers. Its people are not well off, though their lives are slowly improving. New seeds, fertilizers, and credit systems have caused wheat yields to quadruple since 1950.In 1953 a team from the Harvard School of national Health came to Manupur to try out one of the worlds first family planning programs. They visited each homes regularly, took a census, registered all fork ups and deaths. They overly instructed people about modern methods of nascency control and handed out free hindrances.The Harvard team expected that the birth rate would fall. The Punjabis were rural, poor and uneducated. They had an average of seven children per family. Many young people migrated to the city to find jobs the ones who stayed inherited smaller and smaller plots of land. Surely if families knew how to counteract having so many children, they would have fewer.The people of Manupur politely accepted the contraceptive foams and jellies. At the beginning of the Harvard study their birth rate was about 40 babies per 1000 people per year. Six years later the birth rate had gone down a little, to 37.7. But the birth rate had also gone down al l over the Punjab, even where there were no family planning programs.The Harvard researchers concluded that the villagers were not so ignorant after all. Family coat had always been controlled with crude methods such as abstinence and self-induced abortion. Increasing prosperity caused people to want smaller families, because there was less need for children to move in the fields or support parents in their old age. at a time that happened, birth rates went down. Modern contraceptives helped them go down more soft and quickly.