Flawed Criminal Justice System in the United States

The Criminal Justice System of the country is under scrutiny as numerous researchers believe the inadequacy of the outline to punish law offenders. Ide bothy, the evaluator scheme is there to defend federation from its own pile who wear out specific laws that govern social order and relaxation.But it has been criticized for practically other reason. virtuoso of which is that the criminal umpire system is integrally corrupt and dishonored.One major flaw of the criminal referee system in the country is that it demands a family of financial capability, or else you can get out of jail. It is very slow to get out of your term in jail. If one can put up with the bail, then less time in prison result be charged. The more money one has, the less time he or she has to stay in prison to avail of the crime he committed. much(prenominal) is the case of m some(prenominal) a(prenominal) prominent and influential families in the country.But judging from statistics, many people con victed with crimes atomic number 18 more or less poor to devote the standardized bail in the justice courts. Judge who process the hearings argon also a major factor in determining how much would one criminal pay to get out of jail, and if one person is lucky, the judge may sympathized with his/her situation in damage of his/her finances, and bail conditions are much less than the average. This is one of the major flaws in the criminal justice system, money matters.You can get a person out of the ghetto, scarcely you can not remove the ghetto out of him. The aphorism mentions how much the surroundings one person lives affects his behaviour towards society and the people. Another problem criticized in the criminal justice system is the increasing recidivism rate of prisoners in the country. This explains agent criminals not just outlet to jail once, entirely gets arrested for either the like crime or a new one.The question that remains is whether the criminals are punished enough for the crimes committed, becomes reality persists that criminals return to prison after many time. As cited in Scott (2004) study, about 1500 men in the Chicago metropolitan alone returns to their communities each month.The ineffectiveness of the criminal justice system to restore the ex-convicts into leading a more productive and moral life is beingnessness questioned. There are about 44 percent of ex-prisoners rearrested after being released from prison and that says how much inadequate the penalties for law offenders in the country.There are many factors contributing to the rising number of criminals every year, majority of which due to the enchant brought about by drugs and the selling and retailing of drugs.As mentioned by Henslin, there is the normal medicalization of human problems caused by several mood elevators such as alcohol, drugs, nicotine and marijuana. use these drugs has serious effects on the user, and thus actions are affected to begin with with ea ch use. From the use of different drugs arise many other consequences that render to the alarming rate of criminal acts in the country.Henslin suggested that in order to restore these offenders with such influence from drugs, the society mustiness entail the conscious grounds to restrict the influence of the drugs and evoke a sense of acceptance without any punishment or even treatment of punishment to criminals. In the sense, what he is implying is that society must not react with such incidents with unsmooth punishments, otherwise, offenders will not learn.But the rule of law applies to every individual and the state must protect each citizen for each account of violation, if the suggested action is more subdivisionicipatory and society-oriented, that is permitted given that punishment is also given to offenders.The system only dictates its bureau as the primary body which governs all action against criminal offenders, but there also arise the role of the communities and o ther people quest modifying the system and putting a human touch in the reclamation process of the offender.Yes, the suggestion is definitive of what the system needs in terms of more action from the society and how society shall respond, but the law must still be applied because it is the only path to govern peace and order in the society.As mentioned, many researchers have proposed a more socially-oriented way to improve the justice system in the country. Human intervention mingled with reformation groups must exist to support the need for self rehabilitation of offenders. In such suggestions, it also implies the society to immediately relieve all influences in the media, society and community of possible sources of influence such as alcohol commercial and advertisements.That will be very effective if the people in communities themselves adopt the role in which they will take part in rehabilitating these offenders. There must be support groups which aim to process the offend ers in a more righteous path. The criminal justice system must think of more innovative ways to relive the system of increasing recidivism of offenders.Social policy also contributes to the problems in the criminal justice system. The justice system is concerned with major drug use, but as the readings entails, from a medical standpoint, all drugs are considered harmful when taken in excess. The society and the justice system must specify the definition of these terms in order to devise a more distinct approach in solving the problem with drugs.Another approach taken into consideration in remediate of the flawed criminal justice system is the get-tough policy. This is in transmission line with the approach presented earlier that involves the society and the community in rehabilitating offenders. The get-tough policy entails a more rigorous and strict pursuit of offenders in the society. More harsh punishments that will evoke a sense of restriction to anybody who attempts to do har m.There is naught wrong with the policy because there is the sense of responsibility given by the authority and the state in protecting the welfare of the people. But somehow, it questions that completion of this policy in terms of human rights.Or how harsh is the state going to be in punishing offenders? These questions are answered with the right attitude and brief definition of the policies that will be implemented under the rule of law.